Best Selling Books by Russell Martin

Science has invalidated much of the bible, including its theistic understanding of God. Christianity and Judaism will become irrelevant unless they change to accommodate a scientifically defensible understanding of God.

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. To ensure a quality reading experience, this work has been proofread and republished using a format that seamlessly blends the original graphical elements with text in an easy-to-read typeface. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.

The Judaeo-Christian ethic arose within cultures that needed to produce large families in order to survive. The Judaeans originally adopted the sexually promiscuous culture of the Canaanites, but eventually developed their own ethic under the influence of the middle east cultures around them. Through the direction of Paul, Christians took the Judaean ethic and transmitted it throughout the Roman empire. The negative attitude toward sex was a reaction to the crude sensuality and brutality of the dominant cultures. A proper positive code of justifiable appropriate sexual conduct will depend on a thorough examination and selection of the best human practices.

It is generally taken for granted that the authority of Judaean leaders was limited by the Romans from 6--66 CE to the extent that Jewish officials required Roman permission before carrying out such important functions as capital punishment and convening for official judicial purposes. This thesis examines the three critical pieces of literary evidence on which such a determination rests. An analysis of Josephus'' Antiquities 20.202 leads to the conclusion that no restriction on the freedom of a high priest to convene a court in capital cases applied prior to 62 CE. An examination of John 18:31 within the context of the Gospel determines that the author introduced his assertion regarding a restriction on the use of capital punishment by Judaean leaders only in order to explain why it was necessary for Pilate to be involved in Jesus'' death. Finally, explicit descriptions within the Gospels of official Judaean involvement in the arrest and death of Jesus can be adequately explained as both theologically necessary and strategically advantageous for the survival of the messianic sect. As a result, it makes sense to believe that the Judaean leaders were able to function autonomously in carrying out all the provisions of Jewish law from 6--66 CE, with no limitation on the freedom to assemble officially or carry out capital punishment before 62 CE.