New Releases by Fareed Zakaria

DISCLAIMER This book does not in any capacity mean to replace the original book but to serve as a vast summary of the original book. Summary of Age of Revolutions by Fareed Zakaria: Progress and Backlash from 1600 to the Present IN THIS SUMMARIZED BOOK, YOU WILL GET: Chapter provides an astute outline of the main contents. Fast & simple understanding of the content analysis. Exceptionally summarized content that you may skip in the original book Fareed Zakaria''s book examines the modern world''s revolutions, including the Dutch, French, and Industrial Revolutions, and four present-day revolutions: globalization, technology, identity, and geopolitics. He argues that pessimism is premature and that wise action can revive the liberal international order.

A NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER A Wall Street Journal Best Book of 2024 The CNN host and best-selling author explores the revolutions—past and present—that define the polarized and unstable age in which we live. Populist rage, ideological fracture, economic and technological shocks, war, and an international system studded with catastrophic risk—the early decades of the twenty-first century may be the most revolutionary period in modern history. But it is not the first. Humans have lived, and thrived, through more than one great realignment. What are these revolutions, and how can they help us to understand our fraught world? In this major work, Fareed Zakaria masterfully investigates the eras and movements that have shaken norms while shaping the modern world. Three such periods hold profound lessons for today. First, in the seventeenth-century Netherlands, a fascinating series of transformations made that tiny land the richest in the world—and created politics as we know it today. Next, the French Revolution, an explosive era that devoured its ideological children and left a bloody legacy that haunts us today. Finally, the mother of all revolutions, the Industrial Revolution, which catapulted Great Britain and the US to global dominance and created the modern world. Alongside these paradigm-shifting historical events, Zakaria probes four present-day revolutions: globalization, technology, identity, and geopolitics. For all their benefits, the globalization and technology revolutions have produced profound disruptions and pervasive anxiety and our identity. And increasingly, identity is the battlefield on which the twenty-first century’s polarized politics are fought. All this is set against a geopolitical revolution as great as the one that catapulted the United States to world power in the late nineteenth century. Now we are entering a world in which the US is no longer the dominant power. As we find ourselves at the nexus of four seismic revolutions, we can easily imagine a dark future. But Zakaria proves that pessimism is premature. If we act wisely, the liberal international order can be revived and populism relegated to the ash heap of history. As few public intellectuals can, Zakaria combines intellectual range, deep historical insight, and uncanny prescience to once again reframe and illuminate our turbulent present. His bold, compelling arguments make this book essential reading in our age of revolutions.

Hoe is onze wereld veranderd door de pandemie? Van thuiswerken tot de relatie tussen China en Amerika, in dit boek analyseert Zakaria de staat van de economie en de politiek in 2021. ‘De wereld na de pandemie’ is Fareed Zakaria’s nieuwste boek. Lenin zei ooit: ‘Er zijn decennia waarin er niets gebeurt en weken waarin zich decennia lijken te voltrekken.’ We beleven nu zo’n versnelling. Zowel de positie van de VS als een fenomeen als thuiswerken is op slag veranderd. Zakaria helpt lezers de aard van een postpandemische wereld te begrijpen, met name de politieke, sociale en technologische gevolgen die zich in de komende jaren gaan voordoen. In tien hoofdstukken over mondiale thema’s, variërend van biologische risico’s tot de definitieve doorbraak van digitaal leven tot een opkomende bipolaire wereldorde, helpt Zakaria lezers na te denken over de mondiale effecten van de coronacrisis. ‘De wereld na de pandemie’ is een urgent en actueel werk, en nodigt uit tot reflecties op het leven in de eenentwintigste eeuw.

★亞馬遜2020年10月編輯選書 ★紐約時報暢銷書、亞馬遜分類暢銷榜第一名 全球百大公共知識份子札卡瑞亞帶我們預見未來。 這一次，正是讓歷史巨輪快速轉動的關鍵時刻之一。 COVID-19將如何加速歷史發展？ 未來的世界將呈現什麼樣貌？ 自冷戰結束以來，世界已經發生了三次大震盪。 2001年的911事件、2008年的金融崩潰，以及現正水深火熱的2019冠狀病毒大流行。 每一次都是「不對稱威脅」（asymmetric threat）， 從一些看似很小的事情開始，並且與過去世界所經歷的任何事情都不一樣。 列寧曾說過：「有時可能幾十年都沒有大事發生， 但有時也可能在短時間內一口氣發生幾十年才出現一次的巨變。」 瘟疫肆虐的此刻，札卡瑞亞在這部來得迫切又及時的著作中， 預言了後疫情時代的世界本質。 疫情對政治、社會、科技、經濟等領域所造成的影響， 很可能數年後才會真正顯現， 他的論述將幫助我們理解疫後的世界樣貌。 這10堂「課」讀來既令人警醒，又帶給人希望。 他針對自然環境與生物危機、過時的左右派政治分類、 數位生活的興起等各個面向提出討論， 也深入分析全球化的未來、日益加劇的貧富差距， 以及疫情如何使得美中關係惡化。 札卡瑞亞促使我們思考，像人類這樣的社會動物， 社群的概念已然融進我們的天性，而且更重要的是， 正如他在結論中告訴我們的──「天命依然未定」， 未來切切實實的掌握在我們自己手中。 《後疫情效應》說的是過去、現在和未來， 是21世紀初難以忽視的，對世界的深刻省思。 作者簡介 法理德．札卡瑞亞 獲《前景》（Prospect）、《外交事務》（Foreign Affairs） 評選為「全球百大公共知識份子」。 《外交政策》（Foreign Policy）雜誌票選為 「過去十年十大全球思想家」（top ten global thinkers of the last decade）。 主持CNN重量級國際新聞評論節目《札卡瑞亞GPS》（Fareed Zakaria GPS）， 全世界各地有兩億兩百萬個家庭收看。 為《華盛頓郵報》撰寫每週專欄，每月有八千萬至一億名讀者。 著有《自由的未來》、《後美國世界：群雄崛起的經濟新秩序時代》、 《為博雅教育辯護：當人文課熄燈，大學正讓青年世代失去遠大未來》。 《自由的未來》出版時，季辛吉（Henry Kissinger）評論道： 「札卡瑞亞是極為傑出的年輕作家， 他針對西方憲政原則如何影響全球秩序寫下一本引人入勝、發人深省的著作。」 《後美國世界》發表後，艾薩克森（Walter Isaacson）說： 「法理德．札卡瑞亞對國際時事的分析一直以來都很出色， 但更難得的是，他都是對的。如今，他又出版了一部充滿洞見的傑作。」 譯者簡介 盧靜 雜學家。為了畢業劇本接觸TRPG，為了推廣遊戲開始翻譯， 結果入門卻是社會科學。喜歡民俗、文學、社會科學， 希望透過翻譯，讓讀者以新的視角觀看生活與社會。 譯有《平等式資本主義的勝出》。譯作賜教：[email protected]。 廖崇佑 畢業於臺灣大學翻譯碩士學位學程， 譯有《多極世界衝擊》、《眞的好奇怪：希臘神話》、 《貓咪問題全攻略》、《無法測量的領導藝術》、 《國家地理精工系列：經典自行車》等書籍， 現為自由譯者兼英語學習粉絲頁「賓狗單字」共同創辦人。 聯絡信箱：[email protected]。 廖珮杏 自由譯者。偏好議題性的人物故事， 從中探討機制縮影、價值與文化衝突等結構問題。 譯有《重返天安門》、《憤怒與希望》（合譯）、《重病的美國》、 《獨裁者的養成之路》等書籍，以及《電馭叛客2077》（合譯）遊戲。 聯絡信箱：[email protected]。 劉維人 自由譯者。從譯作出發，參與當代民主、公共討論等議題。 譯有《被誤讀的哲學家》、《反民主》、《暴政》、《不穩定無產階級》、 《憤怒與希望》（合譯）、《Mindf*ck 心智操控》等。 譯作賜教：[email protected]。

New York Times Bestseller COVID-19 is speeding up history, but how? What is the shape of the world to come? Lenin once said, "There are decades when nothing happens and weeks when decades happen." This is one of those times when history has sped up. CNN host and best-selling author Fareed Zakaria helps readers to understand the nature of a post-pandemic world: the political, social, technological, and economic consequences that may take years to unfold. Written in the form of ten "lessons," covering topics from natural and biological risks to the rise of "digital life" to an emerging bipolar world order, Zakaria helps readers to begin thinking beyond the immediate effects of COVID-19. Ten Lessons for a Post-Pandemic World speaks to past, present, and future, and, while urgent and timely, is sure to become an enduring reflection on life in the early twenty-first century.

The twentieth semi-annual Munk Debate pits Niall Ferguson against Fareed Zakaria to debate the end of the liberal international order. Since the end of World War II, global affairs have been shaped by the increasing free movement of people and goods, international rules setting, and a broad appreciation of the mutual benefits of a more interdependent world. Together these factors defined the liberal international order and sustained an era of rising global prosperity and declining international conflict. But now, for the first time in a generation, the pillars of liberal internationalism are being shaken to their core by the reassertion of national borders, national interests, and nationalist politics across the globe. Can liberal internationalism survive these challenges and remain the defining rules-based system of the future? Or, are we witnessing the beginning of the end of the liberal international order? The twentieth semi-annual Munk Debate, held on April 28th, 2017, pits prominent historian Niall Ferguson against CNN’s Fareed Zakaria to debate the future of liberal internationalism.

Is it time to reaffirm our liberal values? Or are we seeing the birth-pangs of a new era? Two great thinkers debate the question burning behind headlines across the world. ‘No civilization, no matter how mighty it may appear to itself, is indestructible.’ –Niall Ferguson ‘We do not need to invent the world anew. The international order established by the United States after World War II is in need of expansion and repair, but not reconception.’ –Fareed Zakaria Fears of a globalized world are rampant. Across the West, borders are being reasserted and old alliances tested to their limits. Could this be the end of the liberal order or will the major crises of the twenty-first century strengthen our resolve?

NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER CNN host and best-selling author Fareed Zakaria argues for a renewed commitment to the world’s most valuable educational tradition. The liberal arts are under attack. The governors of Florida, Texas, and North Carolina have all pledged that they will not spend taxpayer money subsidizing the liberal arts, and they seem to have an unlikely ally in President Obama. While at a General Electric plant in early 2014, Obama remarked, "I promise you, folks can make a lot more, potentially, with skilled manufacturing or the trades than they might with an art history degree." These messages are hitting home: majors like English and history, once very popular and highly respected, are in steep decline. "I get it," writes Fareed Zakaria, recalling the atmosphere in India where he grew up, which was even more obsessed with getting a skills-based education. However, the CNN host and best-selling author explains why this widely held view is mistaken and shortsighted. Zakaria eloquently expounds on the virtues of a liberal arts education—how to write clearly, how to express yourself convincingly, and how to think analytically. He turns our leaders'' vocational argument on its head. American routine manufacturing jobs continue to get automated or outsourced, and specific vocational knowledge is often outdated within a few years. Engineering is a great profession, but key value-added skills you will also need are creativity, lateral thinking, design, communication, storytelling, and, more than anything, the ability to continually learn and enjoy learning—precisely the gifts of a liberal education. Zakaria argues that technology is transforming education, opening up access to the best courses and classes in a vast variety of subjects for millions around the world. We are at the dawn of the greatest expansion of the idea of a liberal education in human history.

The fourteenth semi-annual Munk Debate, which will be held in Toronto on November 5, 2014, pits Bret Stephens and Robert Kagan against Fareed Zakaria and Anne-Marie Slaughter to debate the legacy of President Obama. From Ukraine to the Middle East to China, the United States is redefining its role in international affairs. Alliance building, public diplomacy, and eschewing traditional warfare in favour of the focused use of hard power such as drones and special forces are all hallmarks of the so-called Obama Doctrine. Is this a farsighted foreign policy for the United States and the world in the twenty-first century — one that acknowledges and embraces the increasing diffusion of power among states and non-state actors? Or, is an America “leading from behind” a boon for the nations and blocs who want to roll back economic globalization, international law, and the spread of democracy and human rights? In this edition of the Munk Debates, Pulitzer Prize–winning journalist Bret Stephens and famed historian and foreign policy commentator Robert Kagan square off against CNN’s Fareed Zakaria and noted academic and political commentator Anne-Marie Slaughter to debate the legacy of President Obama. With ISIS looking to reshape the Middle East, Russia increasingly at odds with the rest of the West, and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict at a standstill, the Munk Debate on Foreign Policy asks: Has Obama’s foreign policy taken the U.S. in the right direction?

With tensions between Iran, Israel, and Western powers reaching new highs over the Islamic Republic’s nuclear enrichment program, the tenth edition of the Munk Debates investigates how the world should respond to Iran’s nuclear ambitions. For some, the case for a pre-emptive strike on Iran is ironclad. An Iranian bomb would flood the volatile Middle East with nuclear weapons and trap Israel in a state of perilous insecurity — along with much of the world’s oil supply. Others argue that a nuclear Iran could be the very stabilizing force that the region needs, as the threat of nuclear war makes conventional conflicts more risky. These same voices also ask: can the West and Israel afford to attack Iran when doing so could roll back the Arab Spring and re-entrench reactionary forces throughout the Middle East? In this edition of the Munk Debates — Canada’s premier international debate series — former Israel Defense Forces head of military intelligence Amos Yadlin, Pulitzer Prize–winning political commentator Charles Krauthammer, CNN host Fareed Zakaria, and Iranian-born academic Vali Nasr debate the consequences of a nuclear-armed Iran. For the first time ever, this electrifying debate, which played to a sold-out audience, is now available in print, along with candid interviews with the debaters. With tempers flaring between governments, the world’s oil supply in peril, and global security at risk, the Munk Debate on Iran tries to answer: Can the world tolerate an Iran with nuclear weapons?

NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER “A relentlessly intelligent book.” —Joseph Joffe, New York Times Book Review “This is not a book about the decline of America, but rather about the rise of everyone else.” So begins Fareed Zakaria’s blockbuster on the United States in the twenty-first century, and the trends he identifies have proceeded faster than anyone anticipated. How might the nation continue to thrive in a truly global era? In this fully updated 2.0 edition, Zakaria answers these questions with his customary lucidity, insight, and imagination.

"The ''Future of freedom'' is a modern classic that uses historical analysis to shed light on the present, examining how democracy has changed our politics, economics, and social relations"--Back cover.

Interroge la crise mondiale actuelle qui voit démocratie et liberté se diviser et s''opposer au profit de régimes autoritaires aux apparences de légalité. Montre que l''avènement du modèle occidental de la démocratie par de nombreux pays se limite aux signes formels et institutionnels de la liberté sans endosser la primauté de la loi et de la personne qui leur donnent sens.

What turns rich nations into great powers? How do wealthy countries begin extending their influence abroad? These questions are vital to understanding one of the most important sources of instability in international politics: the emergence of a new power. In From Wealth to Power, Fareed Zakaria seeks to answer these questions by examining the most puzzling case of a rising power in modern history--that of the United States. If rich nations routinely become great powers, Zakaria asks, then how do we explain the strange inactivity of the United States in the late nineteenth century? By 1885, the U.S. was the richest country in the world. And yet, by all military, political, and diplomatic measures, it was a minor power. To explain this discrepancy, Zakaria considers a wide variety of cases between 1865 and 1908 when the U.S. considered expanding its influence in such diverse places as Canada, the Dominican Republic, and Iceland. Consistent with the realist theory of international relations, he argues that the President and his administration tried to increase the country''s political influence abroad when they saw an increase in the nation''s relative economic power. But they frequently had to curtail their plans for expansion, he shows, because they lacked a strong central government that could harness that economic power for the purposes of foreign policy. America was an unusual power--a strong nation with a weak state. It was not until late in the century, when power shifted from states to the federal government and from the legislative to the executive branch, that leaders in Washington could mobilize the nation''s resources for international influence. Zakaria''s exploration of this tension between national power and state structure will change how we view the emergence of new powers and deepen our understanding of America''s exceptional history.